Comparison
StallDeck vs Manage My Market
StallDeck fits a manager who wants the stall map, the fee and the public lineup to move as one record, while Manage My Market fits an office built around vendor applications and season long administration.
Comparison
StallDeck fits a manager who wants stall assignment working this Saturday, while Airtable fits an organization with somebody in house who enjoys building and maintaining their own system.
Airtable is a flexible database you shape yourself, and a capable board member can build a serviceable vendor and fee tracker in it. The honest question is who maintains that base in year three, after the volunteer who built it moves away. StallDeck gives up flexibility to give you a stall map, a fee ledger tied to attendance and a public lineup that already understand what a farmers market is. If you have real building capacity and unusual requirements, build. If you want Saturday handled, buy.
| What you are deciding | StallDeck | Airtable |
|---|---|---|
| What you get on day one | A stall map, fee ledger, attendance and public lineup already built for markets. | An empty, very flexible database you design yourself. |
| Stall assignment | A drawn site plan with numbered stalls, fire lanes and per day placement. | Whatever you design; a grid or board view can stand in for a map if you build it. |
| Fees and attendance | Linked by design, so a balance reads as a list of specific mornings. | Possible to model, but the linking logic is yours to build and keep working. |
| Public shopper page | Publishing a market day writes the lineup page for that Saturday. | You would build and style a shared view or connect it to your site yourself. |
| Who maintains it | We do. Updates arrive without a project. | Whoever built the base, for as long as they stay involved. |
| Flexibility | Opinionated. Shaped around how US farmers markets actually run. | Very high. You can model almost anything you are willing to build. |
| Cost shape | Flat monthly: $39 Single Market, $89 Market Season, $189 Association. | Charged on the platform's own published terms, plus the hours you spend building. |
| Best fit | Managers who want the market day handled without a build project. | Organizations with in house building capacity and unusual requirements. |
The right hand column places Airtable by scope and by the sort of operator it serves, with no attempt at a priced feature list. Any product moves on, so confirm the live details on their own pages first. StallDeck is published by MLJ, SASU and this page is written by Jimenez Julien.
Homemade bases usually work fine in their first season, because the person who built it is standing right there. The trouble arrives in year two, when the summer intern who wrote the fee rollup has gone back to school and nobody can explain why the June totals no longer match the deposit slips.
This is not an argument against building. It is an argument for being honest about maintenance. If your market can name the person who will own that base through the next three seasons, building is a reasonable choice. If the honest answer is nobody, you are choosing future work you have not budgeted.
A general database does not know that a fire lane must stay clear, that a hot food vendor needs water and a wastewater plan, that a producer only market ties a stall to a verified farm, or that SNAP tokens must reconcile separately from cash and card. You can teach it all of that, one field and one rule at a time.
StallDeck ships knowing those shapes. Stalls have numbers and neighbors, market days have weather, vendors have certificates with expiry dates, and fees attach to a morning rather than a month. That built in opinion is the whole trade you are making, and it is worth it only if the opinion matches how your market runs.
Take your three worst administrative moments from last season. Perhaps it was the rained out Saturday you had to credit, the vendor who insisted they paid in July, and the shopper who drove in for a farm that was not there. Write down exactly how each would be handled in both options.
Then price your own time honestly. A market manager building and maintaining a custom base is spending hours that could go to recruiting a second bread vendor or chasing a sponsor. If the build saves less than it costs in Saturdays, the answer is not really about software.
Yes. Export your vendor table as CSV and import it into StallDeck, then draw your site plan and place vendors on the first market day. Most markets get their roster in on the same afternoon. Historical fee lines can be imported too if you keep them in a dated table.
It handles flat day fees, season dues, half stalls, double stalls, weather credits and makeup days out of the box, which covers most US markets. Percent of sales reporting is supported as a vendor entered figure. Truly bespoke rules may still be a better fit for a system you build.
Plenty of markets do. Grant tracking, sponsor pipelines and volunteer schedules often stay where they are while StallDeck takes the stall map, fees and attendance. CSV exports move data between the two when you need a combined report for the board.
Comparison
StallDeck fits a manager who wants the stall map, the fee and the public lineup to move as one record, while Manage My Market fits an office built around vendor applications and season long administration.
Comparison
StallDeck fits a market office that wants Saturday to run itself, while Marketwurks fits an organization administering vendors, events and reporting across a wider program.
A page like this can only take the decision so far. Send us your stall count and your vendor list and we will walk a single Saturday through StallDeck on a call, from seating the back row to closing out the fee sheet. Ask the other tool the same questions and pick whichever one handles your worst morning better.